Should domestic-partnership benefits be repealed, now that marriage equality is the law of the land?

"No. Relationships are very complicated. We shouldn’t be too rigid on allocating benefits. It would be fine with me if a family member like a sibling could be designated as a beneficiary of health benefits — just as long as you establish a tie with that person."

"No. Everybody should do what they want. If they want domestic-partnership benefits, they should have them. If they want marriage benefits, they should have them. Just because we have marriage equality doesn’t mean we should do away with domestic-partnership benefits."

"No. People should be able to get the benefits, regardless of whether they’re willing to make a marriage commitment. Relationships are all different. I’m not going to judge a person’s commitment level. I may want domestic-partnership benefits someday."

"No. There should be both options. I tend to be liberal on social issues. There should be a choice. It shouldn’t matter whether you’re married or in a domestic partnership to access benefits."