Q: I’m 63 and considering retirement in the next few years.
I honestly have no idea if I’ve saved enough money to support my retirement, assuming I’ll be around for a long time. How can I tell if I’ll be OK?
A: I promise that you are not alone with this question! Many people planning for or approaching retirement have uncertainty about their savings and need for income in retirement. While meeting with a professional is highly recommended, here are some thoughts to get your retirement income-planning process started.
Although the term “retirement income-replacement ratio” sounds formidable, it’s actually a simple, understandable concept that doesn’t require any fancy math. The ratio helps you zero in on your retirement-savings goal and periodically measure your progress as you move toward your target.
Will you need 60, 75, 90 or even 100 percent of the income you have in your last year of work to maintain a desirable standard of living after you retire? The answer to this question is your income-replacement ratio: the percentage of your pre-retirement earnings that will provide you with the same standard of living in retirement. For example, if your pre-retirement income is $50,000 but your income after retirement is $35,000, you have a replacement ratio of 70 percent ($35,000 divided by $50,000).
Setting the foundation of your plan
Widely used by financial planners, replacement ratios are common elements of worksheets, online calculators and computer-software programs created to help individuals plan how they will finance their retirement years.
With the ratio, you can estimate how much income you may need for a comfortable retirement and how much money you need to save to supplement your expected sources of income — which may be some combination of Social Security, pension benefits, personal investments and post-retirement employment. If these income sources fall short of your goal, you can increase your rate of saving or take other actions to close the projected deficit, such as planning to reduce living expenses or moving to a lower-cost locale in retirement. What research tells us
Opinions vary on the question of how much replacement income retirees need. However, one recent study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that if current Social Security benefits are not reduced, between 83-86 percent of workers with at least 30 years of eligibility in a 401(k) retirement plan could have enough funds to replace at least 60 percent of their age-64 wages on an inflation-adjusted basis.1
When the ante is upped to 70 percent of age-64 pay, the EBRI study found that three-quarters of workers would still have adequate income, relying solely on 401(k) savings and Social Security benefits. At an 80-percent replacement rate, 67 percent of the lowest income group studied would still meet the threshold if they had 30 years of eligibility in a 401(k) plan.1
The bottom line: Many people may need between 60-80 percent of their final working years’ income to maintain their lifestyle after retiring — and long-term commitment to an employer-sponsored retirement plan is key to meeting that goal.
Why don’t retirees need 100 percent of their working income? Lower taxes may be one reason. When a person is no longer employed, there are no Social Security payroll taxes to pay. Federal income taxes are usually lower because Social Security benefits are either partially or fully tax-free for many retirees, and extra deductions are available for people over 65. In addition, many people no longer need to save for retirement, and those who have paid off debts before retiring or eliminated work-related expenses, such as commuting costs, also have a greater share of their income available for spending.
However, one increasingly important “unknown” is the rising cost of medical care. Already, medical care has been taking a bigger bite out of retiree budgets as health-care expenses have risen; some employers have reduced or eliminated medical coverage for retired employees; and life expectancy has lengthened. In addition, retirees have faced higher contributions for Medicare benefits and increased premiums for Medicare supplemental-insurance policies.
The outlook for future retirees
While recent retirees and those nearing retirement may have adequate replacement income, the situation may not be so favorable in the future. For instance, the increasing financial strains on Social Security caused by the nation’s aging population may lead Congress to alter the system at some point in the future, perhaps reducing Social Security benefits or increasing the age of eligibility. As a result of these trends, future retirees may have to rely more on income from personal savings and investments than today’s retirees.
What you can do
Putting yourself on track to a secure retirement requires a few calculations, which can be accomplished relatively easily by using a retirement-planning worksheet or calculator available on the Internet, or from financial advisors and retirement-plan providers.
Calculators and worksheets typically factor in a replacement-income ratio, along with assumptions about future inflation rates, longevity and the growth rate of retirement savings. (As you complete these calculations, bear in mind that such assumptions can’t be guaranteed.) Calculators and worksheets also usually take into account information about your current retirement account balances, rate of savings and anticipated benefits from outside sources, including Social Security and pensions.
While ballpark estimates may be adequate when retirement is a long way off, more accurate planning is advisable as your actual retirement date approaches. If you don’t feel up to the task of refining the numbers, consult a financial advisor. He or she can help you develop detailed income and expense projections, review your assumptions about inflation and future returns from savings and investments and determine a prudent level of withdrawals from your assets.
1Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute, “Can Social Security and 401(k) Savings Be Enough?” Jan. 22, 2014. Jeremy Gussick is a Certified Financial Planner (TM) professional with LPL Financial, the nation’s largest independent broker-dealer.* Jeremy specializes in the financial planning needs of the LGBT community and was recently named a Five Star Wealth Manager by Philadelphia Magazine.** He is active with several LGBT organizations in the Philadelphia region, including the Delaware Valley Legacy Fund and the Independence Business Alliance, the Philadelphia Region’s LGBT Chamber of Commerce. OutMoney appears monthly. If you have a question for Gussick, email him at [email protected]. LPL Financial, a Registered Investment Advisor. Member FINRA/SIPC.
This article was prepared with the assistance of Wealth Management Systems Inc. The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. We suggest that you discuss your specific situation with a qualified tax or legal advisor. Please consult me if you have any questions.
Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by Wealth Management Systems Inc., or its sources, neither Wealth Management Systems Inc., nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall Wealth Management Systems Inc. be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscribers’ or others’ use of the content.
*As reported by Financial Planning magazine, 1996-2013, based on total revenues. **Award based on 10 objective criteria associated with providing quality services to clients such as credentials, experience, and assets under management among other factors. Wealth managers do not pay a fee to be considered or placed on the final list of year 2012 and 2013 Five Star Wealth Managers.
Wealth Management Systems, Inc. and LPL Financial are not affiliated entities.