Last week, I was honored to be invited to the Knight Media Forum in Miami, where more than a thousand professionals from the media, arts and cultural sectors gathered. The panels addressed a broad range of topics you would expect from one of the nation’s most prestigious media organizations. However, during the breaks, many attendees — particularly those from red states and smaller communities — shared their concerns about the new administration’s potential impact on their programs. They worried about possible cuts affecting cancer and Alzheimer’s research and treatment, vaccine studies, school lunches, sports and music programs in schools, drug pricing, access to medical treatments, food safety, nuclear protection and the security of personal data online. The overall sentiment was one of uncertainty and apprehension about the future and the extent of budget cuts that might harm the fabric of America. To illustrate these concerns, the U.S. Congress passed a budget on Feb. 25 that formalized significant reductions — including cuts to Veterans’ benefits, military spending and $880 billion from Medicaid — which is just part of the picture.
These challenges are not limited to traditional sectors; they also have serious implications for the LGBTQ+ community. There are growing concerns that HIV/AIDS research, medications and related aid could be significantly diminished. For those relying on PrEP or receiving HIV/AIDS medications through their insurance, this could mean losing coverage or facing much higher costs. Likewise, LGBTQ+ clinics, community centers and programs for seniors and youth may face staffing reductions and service limitations. Even in blue states, private foundations and state-funded programs may struggle to secure sufficient resources, leading to increased competition for nonprofit funding.
Before heading to Miami, I made an unplanned trip to New York to address an issue with the National Park Services regarding the removal of the “T” from LGBTQ+ history at the Stonewall National Monument. Their decision to alter our history in that way was deeply concerning and underscored the administration’s broader approach to cultural and historical narratives.
If you’ve ever wondered how far this administration is prepared to go, these events should serve as a clear warning. History teaches us that when governments attempt to marginalize segments of their population, the consequences can be severe. The removal of even one element of our community’s identity raises important questions about what might come next — especially in light of recent legislative efforts in several states that challenge the very foundations of our rights.
While many of these issues will ultimately be decided in court, the outcome remains uncertain and largely depends on public response. We are at a pivotal moment, and it is imperative that we remain visible and vocal. Let us use our collective voice to drive the change that our communities need and deserve.