After marriage equality, reproductive reforms still needed

Most LGBT couples spend upwards of $5,000 to go through the adoption process in the United States. As always, Canada is about to make life that much easier for LGBT couples having families. Lawmakers in Ontario introduced legislation last week to give same-sex parents who aren’t biologically related to their children the same legal rights as heterosexual moms and dads. No longer will people who were not previously legally considered parents have to live in fear they cannot make medical and other decisions about their children if a spouse becomes incapacitated.

Post marriage equality, a lot of people think this is true in the United States because both Mom and Mom go on the birth certificate. At the time of the birth of your child, you complete forms in order to receive a birth certificate, and if you’re married, you may list yourself as “married” on such forms. As of July 2015, the Department of Health started issuing the original birth certificate in the maiden name of the birth mother and lists the birth mother’s spouse as “Parent/Father.”

But just because both names appear on the birth certificate as “parents” does not constitute legal parentage. In other words, a birth certificate alone does not confer parental rights and, therefore, relying on just a birth certificate leaves the child and the parents vulnerable in a number of areas and circumstances.

There is currently a proposed Pennsylvania Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act floating around in Harrisburg, but as of now, there is no statute governing parentage in Pennsylvania for children born through assisted-reproductive technologies. Until there is, nothing other than legally forming the “child-parent” relationship through a kinship adoption will confer a parent-child relationship between a non-biological parent and his or her child.

Without an adoption, the parent-child relationship is exposed. For instance, in the case of divorce, the non-birth parent’s rights to the child and custody visitation could be challenged. Moreover, in the case of death, the child’s rights to inheritance could be challenged.

Through an adoption however, the couple would receive an Adoption Decree, and that document and only that document confers a legal parent-child relationship — which carries many rights and obligations such as decision-making in medical situations, custody and child support and inheritance rights.

An Ontario Superior Court ruled 10 years ago that couples who use sperm donors and other reproductive technologies should enjoy the same parental rights as people who conceive naturally. But it took more than 10 years to get to this place where the new bill was introduced.

Don’t get me wrong: Marriage equality has made family planning easier in some respects. For instance, you do not have to complete a home study for an adoption, which, if you’ve gone through one, you’ll know they are very expensive and intrusive. There are people giving birth daily to babies who are either mistreated and/or uncared for, yet LGBT couples have had to endure people coming into their homes to verify its safety and obtain financial references to ensure the couple can afford the baby.

Another benefit of marriage is, depending on where you live, you can file for a pre-birth order, which essentially formalizes the legal parent-child relationship “pre-birth” so that, upon the baby being born, the non-biologically related person is automatically a legal parent. It is still a legal step but one that can be done pre-birth, as opposed to formalizing the parent-child relationship in a four- to five-month process post-birth.

The money and energy LGBT families spend on legal paperwork and worrying should be going toward diapers and play time. Parenthood is an experience unto its own. To add a bunch of legal issues on top of that is a burden parents don’t need. Legislation concretizing the relationship between non-biological parents and their children is long overdue.

 

Newsletter Sign-up