LONDON — Health-care systems worldwide are wasting up to 40 percent of their funds, but more money is needed to boost their capabilities, according to a new report from the World Health Organization.
In an analysis of how countries pay for health and what they get in return, the United Nations agency concluded that, despite these losses, even more funds need to be invested in health care.
The report was released on Monday at an international conference on health financing in Berlin.
Of the approximately $5.3 trillion the world spends on health care every year, about $300 billion disappears in mistakes or corruption, according to European Health Care Fraud and Corruption Network, quoted in the report. Up to a quarter of the money governments are supposedly using to buy drugs is somehow lost along the way, costing developed countries up to $23 billion a year, the report said.
WHO says some countries pay almost double what they should for drugs and that at least half of the medical equipment in poor countries is unusable. Much of the medical equipment donated to developing countries is also useless, it said.
“In some countries, almost 80 percent of health-care equipment comes from international donors or foreign governments, much of it remaining idle,” the report says.
It said most of the medical equipment shipped to the Gaza Strip after 2009 simply sat in warehouses.
Some experts, however, questioned WHO’s calls for more health donations.
“How do you make an impassioned plea for spending more money when we’re wasting so much?” asked William Easterly, a foreign-aid expert at New York University.
He said much of the problem in developing countries is that while donors have spent billions on things like drugs, vaccines and malaria bednets, little has been spent on the health workers needed to distribute them.
“Medicines and vaccines don’t administer themselves,” Easterly said.
He also criticized U.N. agencies and major donors like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who have mostly avoided investing in health systems, preferring instead to build separate programs for illnesses like malaria, polio and AIDS.
“That is like doing aerial bombing at 35,000 feet without knowing what you’re hitting on the ground,” Easterly said. “But investing in medicines for AIDS and malaria makes for much better publicity than investing in health systems.”
David Evans, WHO’s director of health-systems financing, said the focus on disease-specific programs was partly because of the U.N.’s goals to significantly cut poverty and improve health in poor countries by 2015.
“The international community focused on raising new money and channeling it to what it thought was appropriate,” Evans said. “It’s only [been] since about 2005 there’s been an increasing awareness this is not going to get people to where they want to get.”