Should Congress ban the “gay-panic” and “trans-panic” defenses?
Samantha Belgiorno
pet groomer | Bellmawr, N.J.
“Yes, Congress should prevent that. It’s ridiculous. That kind of panic shouldn’t be good enough to be used as a defense. If people are panicked about someone, they can simply walk away. You don’t have to assault the person.”
Samantha Belgiorno
pet groomer | Bellmawr, N.J.
“Yes, Congress should prevent that. It’s ridiculous. That kind of panic shouldn’t be good enough to be used as a defense. If people are panicked about someone, they can simply walk away. You don’t have to assault the person.”

Alexis Gessner
marketing specialist | Lancaster
“Yes. It’s a totally outrageous defense. I can’t see it being appropriate in any situation. I’d feel very comfortable if Congress bans it tomorrow.”

Shaina Krick
administrative assistant | Lancaster
“Yes. It strikes me as very prejudiced against the LGBT community. In this day and age, we shouldn’t be allowing such open prejudice in a courtroom. It would be no different than people using blatant racial prejudice as a defense.”

Matthew Steinberg
real-estate mapper | Wynnewood
“Yes. Those defenses are absurd. You can’t hurt other people because of your ignorance. That’s totally unacceptable. Congress should step up to the plate and ban those defenses.”









