Is glitter-bombing an effective form of protest?

Is glitter-bombing an effective form of protest?

Holly Jackson
teacher | Mt. Airy
“Yes, because it grabs people’s attention. That’s the first step to bring about change. If I saw someone glitter-bombed on the news, I’d be laughing so hard. It’s better than throwing a shoe at someone.”

Holly Jackson
teacher | Mt. Airy
“Yes, because it grabs people’s attention. That’s the first step to bring about change. If I saw someone glitter-bombed on the news, I’d be laughing so hard. It’s better than throwing a shoe at someone.”

Amir Karim
carpenter | North Philadelphia
“No, it’s not productive. You’re just making people mad. The politician is less likely to agree with your point of view if you behave that way. It backfires, and doesn’t help the protester.”

Maureen Welsh
registered nurse | Roxborough
“Yes. It’s very humorous. People appreciate a good laugh. At the same time, it forces them to look at an issue. That’s where you start. And it’s harmless. It doesn’t hurt anyone — as long as the glitter doesn’t get in anyone’s eyes.”

Keith Murray
financial analyst | Abington
“No. I would find it offensive. Glitter-bombing detracts from the message you’re trying to get across because people are turned off by the process. It’s pointless to do something like that.”

Newsletter Sign-up