Ravi convicted of privacy, bias charges in Clementi case
by Jen Colletta
Mar 16, 2012 | 1218 views | 2 2 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TYLER CLEMENTI (LEFT) AND DHARUN RAVI
TYLER CLEMENTI (LEFT) AND DHARUN RAVI
slideshow
The case that sparked a national debate on LGBT youth bullying came to a close Friday morning with the defendant being found guilty on most counts.

A New Jersey jury found Dharun Ravi guilty of invading former Rutgers University roommate Tyler Clementi’s privacy and of bias intimidation because Clementi was gay. While he was exonerated on some of the bias-intimidation charges, he faces 10 years in prison and possible deportation to his native India.

He will be sentenced May 21.

Ravi was found guilty of four invasion-of-privacy and four attempted invasion-of-privacy charges, the most serious he faced. He used his webcam to spy on Clementi and a male guest Sept. 19, 2010, invited others to watch their encounter and attempted to spy again two days later. The following day, Clementi committed suicide.

The jury convicted Ravi of second-, third- and fourth-degree bias-intimidation regarding the Sept. 21 incident.

However, he was acquitted on most of the bias charges from the initial webcam incident and from exhibiting bias against Clementi’s guest in both events.

Ravi was also convicted of hindering the prosecution, witness tampering and evidence tampering.

The seven women and five men on the jury reached their verdict after about 12 hours of deliberations.

Steven Goldstein, chair of New Jersey LGBT-rights group Garden State Equality, said the two weeks of testimony illustrated that Ravi was acting out of antigay animus.

“Ravi would not have invaded the privacy of a straight roommate,” he said. “In fact, the most compelling evidence in the case, Ravi’s text messages, indicated exactly that. The text messages demonstrated beyond any doubt that Ravi was deeply uncomfortable with Tyler’s being gay.”

Goldstein said the verdict demonstrates “that a ‘kids will be kids’ defense is no excuse to bully another student."

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
JordanGwendolynDavis
|
March 16, 2012
You know what I think should happen. They should pass a law stating that if you drive someone to commit suicide, you should be charged with manslaughter. Sadly, Pennsylvania's legislature is filled with Appalachian cave trolls who won't even consider such a thing. Maybe New Jersey could do so.
Philatonian
|
March 19, 2012
Legally define "drive someone to suicide." I understand the knee jerk reaction to this scum bag, but in the end Clementi chose to take his own life. I can't express how horrible Ravi is for what he did, but when someone commits suicide you can't blame the words or actions of others. He controlled his decision. If Clementi had chosen to go on a shooting spree because of the act, would we still absolve him of his responsibility? It's a touchy issue and no one is willing to discuss it objectively. Since we can't give society a death sentence for creating a string of events that led to this, we look for the closest a*s hole. He deserves what he got but he's not a murderer.