Sestak backs gay marriage
by Jen Colletta
6 months ago | 2497 views | 14 14 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
REP. JOE SESTAK Photo: Scott A. Drake
REP. JOE SESTAK Photo: Scott A. Drake
slideshow
U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak (D-7th Dist.) is looking to unseat longtime U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter (D) in this spring’s primary election and is pledging to bring to the Senate a commitment to generate viable change for LGBT individuals in Pennsylvania and across the nation.

Sestak, 58, a Delaware County native, has served in Congress since 2007, after a decorated military career: He served in the Navy from 1974-2005 and, as a three-star admiral, holds the distinction of the highest-ranking former military officer ever to have served in Congress.

Sestak has made headlines in recent months for his strong opposition to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the military’s ban on openly gay servicemembers, a position he said he’s held since the bill’s 1993 passage.

“I was a Navy captain at the time and, the day after it was passed, a two-star admiral came up to me and said, ‘What do you think about this?’ and I said, ‘It’s unconstitutional. I have no doubt that the Supreme Court will throw it out in a couple months.’ But unfortunately that didn’t happen,” Sestak said.

He added the U.S. military is “behind the times” in its treatment of LGBT servicemembers.

“How can you ask someone that you went to war with to not have the same equal rights as you? It’s wrong. We’ve worked through the issue of African Americans in the military. We’ve worked through the issue of women in combat. I don’t care if you’re red, blue, green or GLBT. I want you to do your job, and I’m going to hold you accountable for that, but we need the best of all of our communities in the military for the military to be its best.”

Military action

Sestak is a cosponsor of the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, a bill to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” that is being spearheaded by fellow Pennsylvanian Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-8th Dist.). Sestak has written letters to President Obama and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on the policy and, last year, advocated on behalf of Lt. Dan Choi to the Army’s Discharge Board, which is releasing Choi under the policy.

Also last year, Sestak led a campaign to relaunch an investigation into allegations of abuse leveled by gay former Navy sailor Joseph Rocha, who said he endured emotional and physical abuse, such as being tied to a chair, forced to simulate oral sex with another man and locked in a dog kennel filled with feces.

“I was at an event in town and a gentleman came up and asked if I’d heard about this situation, and I said no and he sent me the information, and to be honest at first I found this hard to believe. Dog feces? Handcuffs? I mean none of us were perfect when I was in the Navy, but that is just not the Navy that I knew,” Sestak said.

He contacted the Chief of Naval Operations, who agreed to launch an investigation into the situation, which in the fall resulted in the censuring of the individual who allegedly spearheaded the abuse. Sestak said he’s still awaiting further action on the lack of oversight in the case.

“I spoke to the Secretary of the Navy and said that there has to be a follow-up,” he said. “In the Navy, if a captain is sleeping at 2 a.m. and someone falls asleep steering the ship, the captain is accountable. There are people who saw this and knew what was going on, and they need to be accountable.”

Sestak said Congress also needs to be held accountable for lifting “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

“Congress put this in there, and I think we have a constitutional responsibility to remove it. I think if you ask pretty much any Democrat if they individually think ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ should be repealed, they’ll say yes, but I’m worried there’s not a lot of courage right now,” he said.

Accountability

Sestak noted that many legislators “ran to the hills” on the issue of the inclusion of the “public option” in the healthcare-reform bill, of which he is an advocate, a trend he said is all too prevalent in the political field.

“We need a sense of accountability in our leaders in Washington, D.C. People should not be taking positions because they’re more worried about maintaining their legacy or their jobs rather than being willing to risk that for a principled compromise, as opposed to compromising their principles.”

Sestak said Specter made such a move when he announced in the fall that he no longer supported the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal ban on same-sex marriage, which he originally voted for in 1996. Specter told PGN his position switch reflected the nation’s, as well as his own, progression on LGBT-rights issues, but Sestak said he doubted the veracity of that claim.

“I was sent a letter by one of my constituents that had been sent to him in September by Sen. Specter in which he says he supports DOMA. And then a couple weeks later he came out in opposition to it,” he said. “The biggest difficulty the Democratic Party has right now is not the Republican Party, but rather a lack of trust from our constituents. This is why I’m running. I’m very fortunate; I’ve already done everything I’ve wanted to do in life — I commanded a ship, and that was what I’d always wanted to do. I didn’t even want to initially run for Senate, and I’m not craving to be president. So maybe it’s easier for me, but I’m not running for the job, I’m running to give back.”

Sestak said that, if and when DOMA is repealed, he would support legislation to legalize civil unions or marriage for same-sex couples at the federal level; he said he favors civil unions, as he believes marriage is more of a “church issue,” but said he would “not be opposed” to extending it to same-sex couples.

“It’s an issue of national importance that shouldn’t be decided state-by-state, as it is, because then nobody wants to touch it. I don’t think it’s just a state issue. How can you be in one state and be discriminated against in another state? I do think civil rights have to have federal legislation.”

Immigration reform

In addition to the bills to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and DOMA, Sestak is a cosponsor of nearly every other pro-LGBT bill in Congress, except the Uniting American Families Act, a measure that seeks to eliminate discrimination in immigration laws for same-sex couples.

Sestak said he is a strong proponent of the idea of UAFA but believes that, to be successful, it should be part of a comprehensive immigration-reform bill. In addition, he said, if it proceeds as a stand-alone bill, the language of the current measure, introduced in February by U.S. Rep Jerold Nadler (D-N.Y.), needs to ensure that same-sex and heterosexual couples are treated equally.

Sestak said he’s met numerous times with Rep. Louis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) to ensure inclusion of UAFA in the comprehensive bill Gutierrez is spearheading, and that he’s also drafting his own version of UAFA that provides further clarification that same- and opposite-sex couples will have to follow the same procedures. If UAFA is not included in the comprehensive immigration measure, Sestak plans to introduce his bill as an amendment to the comprehensive legislation if and when it reaches the Rules Committee.

Sestak — who has attended OutFest, Pride and numerous other LGBT events in Allentown, Reading and other locales, and served as a guest speaker at the 2008 Equality Forum and the keynote speaker at that year’s Human Rights Campaign Philadelphia Gala — said that throughout the rest of the campaign, and if he’s elected to the Senate, the LGBT community should feel comfortable bringing their concerns to him and relying on him to take action on those issues.

“I promise to be accountable, accessible, honest and working hard for the interests of everyone equally. The GLBT community does not have equal rights and simply we have to have that. This country stands for equal rights, and I want to fight for that principle every day.”

Jen Colletta can be reached at jen@epgn.com.

comments (14)
« Jeanie 13 wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:37 PM »
OK Joe - big words, I will support your bid for Dem Primary today. Gay Right's and your positive perspective has swayed me from Honorable Arlen Specter. Please stay true to your words.
« Stonewaller wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 12:27 PM »
TAMPZEK

Furthermore, the origninal architects of SSM have observed that when we campaign for domestic partnerships or civil, we always win and when we insist on the word "marriage," we almost always lose.

The best strategy will be to obtain CU/DP first and then go from there.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is the enemy.

This is a common problem among LGBT who thus alienate many potential allies.
« Stonewaller wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 12:26 PM »
TAMPAZEKE I participated in the rallies, protests and demonstrations following Stonewall which have since come to be known at the "Three Days of Rage."

I began advocating for Same Sex Marriage 20 years

ago, before it was a gleam in the eye of most LGBT.

Many supporters of SSM -- Gay as well as Straight

-- think that the word "marriage" should be left at the church house door. We would have no problem with all marital type relationships being legally labelled "civil unions" as is generally the case in Europe.

« Tim K. wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 04:26 PM »
I applaud Rep. Sestak and his support of LGBT issues, especially his mention of UAFA. I am a person in a binational, same-sex relationship and pray every day that somehow, someone will FINALLY "legislate" away the injustices and discrimination we binationals face. I guess I am a cautious about a politician that professes to support UAFA yet is not a co-sponsor. Sure, he notes he has some issues with the language of the current bill but should he not commit his support by endorsing the current measure? Please, Rep Sestak, the LGBT community is tired of hollow, empty promises. ALL LGBT issues need to be addressed and rectified ASAP, not piecemealed out one "right" at a time. We are counting on you to be true to your word...
« Bickle wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 01:39 PM »
Joe supported ending the war too. Then he got in office. So unless he is willing to sign legally binding documents to support us in all things on this issue,I don't believe a word he says
« Brian Kowaski wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 01:37 PM »
Joe, Joe you're my man. I'm certainly happy to see somebody jump on our bandwagon, particularly the UAFA one. It's time things start to change positively in the good ole USA, and fortunately I can help vote this one in. Thanks again Rep. Sestak for your support on all LGBT matters.
« TampaZeke wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 10:21 AM »
He had me right up until he said that he supports civil unions over marriage because "marriage is a church issue".

BULLSHIT!

CIVIL MARRIAGE has NEVER been a church issue and it isn't one now. MATRIMONY is a church issue. The SPIRITUAL BLESSING of a marriage is a church issue.

Certainly a man as intelligent and progressive as he should know this.

I suspect that he is still lacking a vertibra or two in the backbone he rightly says other Democrats lack.

Come on Sestak, fix this small but significant flaw in your platform and you'll be batting 1000.
« Roy B wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 10:07 AM »
I want to thank you for support the Uniting American families act! It time has long come and gone, no one in my family and friends don’t understand why this country is so backward when it comes to my civil rights that are being stomped on by the US government.

Just to fill you in, I’m legally married in Canada and can’t sponsor my husband into this country, but if we went to 20 other countries we would be legally married.

« roy B wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 10:06 AM »
I want to thank you for support the Uniting American families act! It time has long come and gone, no one in my family and friends don’t understand why this country is so backward when it comes to my civil rights that are being stomped on by the US government.

Just to fill you in, I’m legally married in Canada and can’t sponsor my husband into this country, but if we went to 20 other countries we would be legally married.

« Rob Vaswilas wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 09:47 AM »
Thank you Congressman Sestak for your support in all LGBT issues. The Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) as it's own bill or included in Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) would bring me and my partner together not to mention the thousands of bi-national same gender couples all over the country living separately like me and my partner, together in fear of being separated or in exile waiting for the discriminatory immigration laws to change and be able to come home. As one of your constituents, I applaud your standing up and fighting for equal rights for ALL Americans.
« juankgalan wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 09:44 AM »
this is so exciting! UAFA needs to pass soon! Thank you Rep. Sestak for your support and for all your work in the new wave of the civil rights movement!
« Sam D. wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 09:38 AM »
Thanks to the author for this story.

Kudos to Rep. Sestak for supporting us, esp. for his support for UAFA.
« Tom T. wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 09:14 AM »
This is great news to hear from Congressman Sestak on The Uniting American Families Act (UAFA). Tens of thousands of families are affected by our current discriminatory immigration laws, and Americans are forced to chose between the person they love and our country. LGBT families need immigration reform too, and the LGBT community needs to realize this and be part of the fight to change our sorely outdated immigration laws!
« jhc1 wrote on Friday, Jan 15 at 01:33 AM »
I am waiting to see what Specter has to say. Equlity for the GLBY community is THE civil rights issue this generation. It is now time for all politicians to step up to the plate. Gay Democrats cannot be captive vote.